Gen-Yers have a well-deserved reputation for technology in the DNA. They grew up with it, understand it and like to use it. On several occasions, however, some of my Gen-Y colleagues have set themselves up for difficulty by their use of email rather than face-to-face.
In a recent post my friend, Alexandra Levit, emphasized the importance of face-to-face communication for building relationships. I noted that professionals in many fields are resistant to using email for strategic relationships. They insist on phone and regular face-to-face meetings. They have found what I've argued to be true: email is dangerous. It is profoundly open to misunderstanding. In some relationships it can easily set you up for liability issues and it, therefore, should be kept to the minimum. My architectural clients maintain that stance as much as possible. Lawyers also refuse to put much in email for the same reasons. And senior execs tend to keep email at a minimum, detailing only matters such as meeting times, confirmations, etc.
It's impossible to exaggerate the importance and value of the face-to-face conversations and the nonverbal component. A recent article from Negotiation detailed three problems with emailing that we need to pay attention to not only in negotiation but in all interpersonal emailing.
Email leads to subpar outcomes. It lacks both the visual and vocal cues that are so much a part of communication. As a result the writers can become overly self-absorbed and self-interested. Face-to-face conversation moderates feelings and ideas, and enables us to better explore interests and relationships. If you intend to use email, try to follow it up with a face-to-face or phone conversation.